IoT phishing occurs when attackers use connected devices (or messages pretending to come from them) as part of a social engineering attack. Instead of a typical “email from IT,” the bait may look like a security alert from a smart device, router, medical device, or building system.
According to the study Identifying and Mitigating Phishing Attack Threats in IoT Use Cases Using a Threat Modelling Approach, IoT phishing attacks in connected systems exploit both human trust and vulnerabilities in IoT ecosystem components. These tactics are used to deceive users or systems into disclosing sensitive information or spreading harmful content. While conventional phishing typically uses deceptive emails or websites, IoT phishing often leverages legitimate-looking device communications to achieve similar ends. The mechanism of action is as follows:
IoT environments, such as smart homes or autonomous systems, include multiple components (sensors, gateways, cloud services, and apps) that can contain design or implementation vulnerabilities. Attackers analyze these components for weaknesses that could lead to phishing-enabling threats, such as spoofing, information disclosure, or privilege escalation. These threats can be exploited to manipulate how information flows through the system or how devices communicate with users.
Once an adversary identifies a weak or insecure element, like a cloud service or device gateway, they can impersonate that service. For example:
These messages look legitimate because they resemble real IoT system communication patterns, making it more likely a user will trust and follow them, such as by clicking a link or submitting credentials.
Many IoT components transmit data across zones, from the sensor, gateway, cloud, to the user. If an attacker can intercept or manipulate this data due to an information disclosure threat, they can collect sensitive information or redirect users to malicious endpoints. For instance, by capturing session tokens or account information, the attacker may generate phishing content that appears to come from the legitimate IoT system.
An attacker who gains access or intercepts communication can embed malicious links within:
These links may direct users to fake login pages that steal usernames and passwords. Since they resemble real IoT interfaces, users are more likely to be deceived.
Even where technical attack vectors exist, phishing ultimately depends on social engineering. Attackers design their fake communications to exploit trust in the IoT device brand or service and prompt urgent action, such as “update your credentials,” “confirm device safety,” or “validate your account.” This mirrors classic phishing but is now contextualized within IoT systems.
IoT phishing attacks typically originate from trusted communication channels within the IoT ecosystem, which attackers exploit to appear legitimate. According to the above study, these sources span multiple layers of the IoT architecture, increasing both attack surface and credibility:
See also: HIPAA Compliant Email: The Definitive Guide (2025 Update)
Defending against IoT phishing requires a layered security approach that addresses both technical vulnerabilities in IoT architectures and human susceptibility to social engineering. The study emphasizes that phishing risks emerge across multiple IoT trust zones, making holistic defense essential. To defend against IoT phishing, you must:
Read also: Best Practices for securing medical IoT devices
Common targets include smart cameras, routers, printers, medical devices, smart home systems, and industrial IoT equipment—especially those managed through cloud platforms.
Yes. Stolen credentials or compromised devices can be used to gain broader network access, enabling data breaches, ransomware attacks, or unauthorized system control.
While updates reduce technical vulnerabilities, IoT phishing primarily exploits human behavior, so training and verification processes remain essential.