Research published in Internet of Things and Cloud Computing defines traditional manual GRC processes as "often inefficient, error-prone, and ill-equipped to manage the dynamic nature of cloud environments, leading to compliance violations and heightened risks." GRC automation platforms address these challenges by integrating governance, risk management, and compliance functions into a unified system that reduces manual effort and improves visibility across an organization's regulatory obligations.
Go deeper: A deep dive into HIPAA's administrative safeguards
GRC automation platforms consolidate three interconnected disciplines into a single framework.
Traditionally, organizations managed these functions separately using spreadsheets, emails, and disconnected software tools. The Pinninti study identifies several challenges with this approach:
As the research notes, "Traditional, siloed GRC approaches are often inadequate in addressing the dynamic nature of cloud computing, where misconfigurations, unauthorized access, and evolving threats are prevalent."
GRC automation platforms replace fragmented manual processes with centralized systems that continuously monitor controls, track regulatory changes, automate evidence collection, and generate audit-ready reports. The healthcare sector faces particular urgency given overlapping regulatory frameworks including HIPAA, state privacy laws, and contractual obligations from business associate agreements.
Learn more: How to perform a risk assessment
GRC automation platforms provide several integrated functions that work together to streamline compliance operations. The Pinninti study identifies key features found in modern platforms:
Read more: What you need to know about log monitoring
The Pinninti study presents a case study of a mid-sized financial services organization that implemented GRC automation aligned with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The results demonstrate improvements across multiple metrics.
The organization achieved a 40% reduction in manual effort for compliance tasks and a 30% improvement in incident response times. Automated workflows decreased issue remediation time from 30 days to 5 days. Compliance costs dropped by 40%, and audit findings decreased by 70%.
These efficiency gains matter for healthcare organizations operating under multiple overlapping frameworks. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework organizes cybersecurity activities into five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. GRC platforms map organizational controls to these functions, providing structured coverage across the security lifecycle.
The research found that "real-time dashboards provided a holistic view of risks across cloud and on-premises environments." This visibility enables security teams to prioritize remediation efforts based on actual risk rather than working through compliance checklists sequentially.
Future developments in GRC automation are being shaped by innovations highlighted in Onspring’s healthcare whitepaper. The report emphasizes how AI‑driven analytics, blockchain‑based audit trails, and adaptive security protocols are transforming compliance operations.
AI enables predictive risk modeling to anticipate emerging threats, blockchain ensures immutable evidence for audits, and adaptive protocols allow organizations to dynamically adjust controls as regulations evolve. For healthcare providers navigating HIPAA, state privacy laws, and complex business associate agreements, such capabilities are a baseline. By embedding intelligence and resilience into GRC platforms, organizations can move from reactive compliance to proactive risk management, strengthening both patient trust and operational resilience.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a risk-based framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that organizes cybersecurity activities into five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. It is customizable to organizational needs and aligns with other standards like ISO 27001, making it widely adopted for structuring security programs.
Control mapping links security controls to the specific regulatory requirements they satisfy. A single control, such as encryption or access management, may address requirements across multiple frameworks including HIPAA, NIST, and PCI DSS. GRC platforms maintain these relationships so organizations can demonstrate compliance across frameworks without duplicating documentation efforts.
ISO 27001 is an international standard for information security management systems (ISMS) published by the International Organization for Standardization. It provides a systematic framework for managing sensitive information through risk assessment, security controls, and continuous improvement processes. Organizations can achieve formal certification by demonstrating compliance with the standard's requirements, which many business partners and regulators recognize as evidence of mature security practices.