According to A Systematic Review on the Impact of Electronic Health Services on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care, “Electronic health services (EHS) integrate telecommunications, electronic patient data, and computerized medical knowledge.”
Their implementation shows efforts to improve efficiency, safety, and access to care. However, their impact on patient satisfaction depends on how these services are implemented and integrated into clinical workflows.
The integration of technology into healthcare delivery has accelerated over the past decade. According to the review, “the growing implementation of EHS in primary care underscores the necessity to comprehend its effect on patient satisfaction and highlight areas for improvement.”
More specifically, it directly impacts primary care, where long-term patient-provider relationships, continuity of care, and communication are central to the patient experience.
EHS can include EHRs that digitize patient medical histories, telemedicine platforms that allow remote consultations, patient portals that provide access to test results and health information, and online systems for appointment scheduling and prescription management. Collectively, these technologies improve the organization's care delivery and reduce inefficiencies.
The review notes that these tools “have the potential to make healthcare more organized and available, which leads to more safety, effectiveness, and equitability.” However, realizing this potential requires careful attention to how patients experience these systems in practice.
An electronic health record (EHR) is one of the most commonly used EHS. They centralize patient information and support clinical decision-making through alerts, reminders, and immediate data access. EHRs “minimize clinicians’ workloads by combining patient information, reducing medical errors, and supporting evidence-based clinical decision-making procedures,” as evidenced by the review.
From an operational standpoint, these benefits are well established. However, patient satisfaction is influenced by efficiency as well as the quality of interactions during care encounters. The review found that “increased provider focus on EHR use, including prolonged silence and gaze at the screen, negatively influenced patient-centered communication and involvement.” So, while EHRs may improve backend processes, their presence in the clinical encounter can affect patient perceptions of attentiveness and engagement.
At the same time, the review also found that “in a variety of contexts, the use of EMRs enhanced patient satisfaction with clinical consultations, services, and overall healthcare experiences.” Improvements, like faster referrals, clearer prescriptions, and reduced wait times, were commonly cited.
Ultimately, the impact of EHRs on satisfaction depends on how they are incorporated into patient care.
Telemedicine has experienced a major boom since the COVID-19 pandemic. The review describes telemedicine as a means of delivering care remotely through telecommunications technologies, noting that it can “eliminate geographical barriers” and improve access for patients in rural or underserved areas.
Studies included in the review suggest that telemedicine can increase follow-up adherence and reduce missed appointments. However, the shift to remote care has also raised questions about whether virtual interactions meet patient expectations, particularly for those who are accustomed to in-person consultations.
While telemedicine has its advantages, patient satisfaction appears to depend on factors such as visit purpose, technological reliability, and patient comfort with digital platforms.
According to the research, “patient portals and EHS demonstrated increased satisfaction with healthcare quality, particularly among patients with long-term provider relationships.” It specifically allows patients to access test results, manage appointments, and communicate with providers outside of scheduled visits.
The review identifies enhanced communication as the driver of patient satisfaction. Therefore, communication tools that allow quick responses and information sharing support patient engagement and autonomy. It is reflected in the finding that “effective prescription and referral procedures, improved communication, and reduced wait times were among the improvements.”
At the same time, preferences for communication modes varied. “Socioeconomic factors, such as age, education, and income, influenced preferences for communication modes like portals, phone calls, and text messages.”
Related: How to use HIPAA compliant email to promote socioeconomic inclusion
Among EHS communication tools, HIPAA compliant email, like Paubox, is the most easily accessible option. It allows patients and providers to securely exchange protected health information (PHI), protecting the information during transmission and at rest, upholding HIPAA rules.
It allows patients to ask follow-up questions, receive care instructions, and clarify treatment plans without the constraints of synchronous communication. In addition, email is a lower-barrier option for patients who find portals inconvenient and difficult to navigate.
Its familiarity supports engagement among patients with varying levels of digital literacy, provided that messages are clear and accessible, accommodating diverse patient needs.
Go deeper:
The review explains Donabedian’s Structure-Process-Outcome framework to explain how EHS affects patient satisfaction. The model examines three areas of healthcare to evaluate the quality of healthcare:
Using this framework helps explain how the healthcare environment and systems (structure) influence how care is delivered (process), which then affects results such as patient satisfaction and quality of care (outcomes). Overall, the review found that EHS improved satisfaction through better access and transparency.
The review shows disparities in EHS adoption and satisfaction. Studies showed that younger, wealthier, and more educated individuals were more likely to adopt and benefit from EHS, while others faced barriers related to access and digital literacy.
Interestingly, some findings diverged from expectations. For example, the review reports that patients with lower educational attainment sometimes expressed higher satisfaction, potentially due to differing expectations or perceived benefits from basic EHS features. These findings suggest that satisfaction is influenced by system performance as well as user expectations and prior experiences.
Therefore, to avoid EHS that is “unfair” and limited “ability to enhance care for underserved populations in the absence of focused interventions,” healthcare organizations must use HIPAA compliant emails. These emails must have an inclusive design to address disparities for populations with limited digital access.
Several studies in the review identified communication challenges associated with EHS use. Providers who spent more time interacting with EHRs during visits were perceived as less engaged. As the review summarizes, “providers who spent more time gazing at computer screens or introduced long periods of conversational silence received lower ratings for communication and engagement.”
Interoperability and improved system design may help mitigate these issues. Paubox email, for example, automatically encrypts outgoing emails, reducing providers’ documentation burden and workflow disruptions.
It streamlines communication and secure transmission of PHI, so providers spend less time on EHRs during patient visits and engage more with patients. It addresses the challenges the review mentions, helping healthcare organizations enhance the overall patient experience and quality of care.
HIPAA compliant email provides a secure technological infrastructure that allows providers to send lab results, imaging reports, and medication instructions directly to patients without risk of data breaches.
It can be integrated with existing electronic health record systems so that messages, attachments, and patient responses are automatically linked to the patient’s chart, giving all members of the care team consistent access to the same up-to-date information.
HIPAA compliant email improves how care is delivered, allowing providers to send follow-up instructions, clarify treatment plans, and coordinate referrals outside of face-to-face visits. It also reduces interruptions during appointments, allowing providers to focus on patient interaction and maintain timely responses to patient inquiries.
HIPAA compliant email can enhance patient satisfaction by delivering information, improving adherence to care plans, and increasing transparency. It supports patient autonomy and contributes to higher perceived quality of care, reinforcing the overall effectiveness of electronic health services in primary care.
Learn more: How HIPAA compliant emails support patient autonomy
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) safeguards protected health information (PHI), like medical records, treatment plans, and billing information.
Yes, HIPAA applies to all healthcare providers who deal with PHI, including doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and any business associates handling patient data.
Healthcare providers must use a HIPAA compliant email solution, like Paubox, to safeguard patients’ PHI during transmission and storage. These solutions maintain patient privacy and uphold federal standards to help build a trusting patient-provider relationship.